Lea Nilsson vs Francesca Pace Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the last six months, Nilsson's second serve point win rate has been slightly better at 41.51%, compared to Pace's 39.14%. Could this provide Nilsson with a slight edge?
• Both players display nearly equal performance on return games. Pace edges slightly with a 50.5% success rate on second serve returns, while Nilsson has a 50.75% win rate. For first serve returns, Pace leads with 33.24% over Nilsson's 31.99%.
• When facing breakpoints, Pace has successfully saved 41.22%, outperforming Nilsson, who saves 37.7%. This demonstrates Pace's resilience under pressure.
• Over the last year, Nilsson holds a higher match win percentage at 63.64% compared to Pace's 60%. Which could indicate better overall form?
• Regarding surface preferences, Pace shows moderate proficiency on clay with a 54% win rate, whereas Nilsson boasts stronger performance on indoor hard courts with a 71% win rate. However, both show vulnerabilities on outdoor hard courts.
• Pace frequently competes at the Challengers/ITF level, winning 58.54% of those matches, while Nilsson competes more in Futures/Satellites, with a 50% win rate.
• On average, Pace faces tougher opponents, ranked 380.47, while Nilsson's opponents rank at an average of 527.55. This could suggest Pace is more seasoned against higher-level competition.
• In matches that go to a deciding set, Pace has a stronger outcome, winning 50% compared to Nilsson’s 25% over the past year.
• Both Pace and Nilsson show similar breakpoint conversion rates, with 43% and 43.48%, respectively, indicating a balanced potential for breaking serves during the match.

Editorial Prediction (June 19, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match promises to be competitive, with both players showing strengths in different areas. Nilsson exhibits a slightly better second serve point win percentage, suggesting an edge in serving proficiency. However, this advantage is marginal.

Pace's slight superiority in saving breakpoints and facing stronger average opponent ranks could play a crucial role in tight situations. His expertise on clay suggests adaptability, although the current match surface remains key.

Considering resilience in deciding sets, Pace has the upper hand, possibly turning critical moments in his favor, especially if the match extends into a long battle.

Given these insights, Pace emerges as the probable winner, leveraging his break-saving ability and experience against stronger opposition to tip the scales in his favor.